Skip to content
Ryan Smith, DDS

Clinical · Diagnostic imaging

ADA radiation safety recommendations (2024): lead aprons and thyroid collars come off, unless your state says otherwise

On February 1, 2024, an ADA Council on Scientific Affairs expert panel published recommendations that patient lead aprons and thyroid collars are no longer recommended for dental imaging, for all patients including pregnant ones. Rectangular collimation, digital receptors and careful CBCT selection replace them. State law still governs.

Clinical guidelines and evidence

Issued by

ADA Council on Scientific Affairs

2024

Status
current
Source
ada.org
Last read
2026-09-13
Two schematic panels. Left, a round beam field much larger than the intraoral receptor, with the tissue outside the receptor shaded as exposed but not imaged. Right, a rectangular beam field only slightly larger than the receptor, with almost nothing outside it.
Why the apron became unnecessary: rectangular collimation keeps the beam close to the size of the receptor, so the tissue that shielding used to cover is largely out of the field to begin with. Illustration of the principle; proportions are schematic, not measured.Open full size
published online in JADA and announced by the ADA
Feb 1, 2024
articles, guidance documents and regulations the panel reviewed
95
covered, regardless of age or pregnancy
All patients
still decides whether the apron stays on
State law

Covered

3
  • Every dental patient, whatever their age or health status, including pregnant patients
  • Intraoral, panoramic and cephalometric radiography and cone-beam CT: the ADA states thyroid collars are not recommended for any imaging procedure in dentistry
  • How images are ordered: patient selection, digital receptors, rectangular collimation, positioning, and CBCT only when a lower-exposure option will not do

Not covered

2
  • Practices in a state whose statute or board rule still requires aprons or collars. The ADA's own words: dentists should abide by the laws and regulations where they practice
  • Operator protection is a separate question. The panel recommends dosimeters and work-practice controls for pregnant staff who work with X-rays; nothing here relaxes that

Timeline

  1. 2012

    1. 2012

      ADA and FDA patient-selection recommendations for dental radiographs, the prior reference, describe protective aprons

  2. 2024

    1. Feb 1

      JADA publishes the Council on Scientific Affairs panel's recommendations online; ADA announces shielding is no longer recommended

    2. Mar 25

      Hawaii Board of Dentistry notice: HRS §448-1.5 still requires a lead apron; the ADA guidance does not change it

    3. Apr

      Print issue: JADA volume 155, issue 4

    4. Sep 27

      Texas State Board of Dental Examiners stakeholder meeting on removing its lead-apron rules (22 TAC §§108.42, 113.2)

  3. 2026

    1. Mar 26Latest

      ADA's X-rays topic page, last updated this date, still states thyroid collars are not recommended for any dental imaging

What it says

On February 1, 2024, the Journal of the American Dental Association published recommendations from an expert panel convened by the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, developed with support from FDA medical physicists. The panel searched systematic reviews, organizational guidelines and regulatory reviews published since 2010; 95 documents met its criteria.

The headline: the use of lead abdominal aprons or thyroid collars on patients during dental X-rays is no longer recommended. The panel's reasons are that the shields are not necessary to protect patients from the exposure of modern dental imaging, and that they can block the primary beam, which means retakes and more dose, not less.

Protection comes from the equipment and the ordering instead. The recommendations call for restricting the beam to the area being imaged with rectangular collimation, using digital receptors rather than film, positioning the patient properly, ordering radiographs to get the diagnostic information you need and no more, and using cone-beam CT only when a lower-exposure option will not answer the clinical question.

The ADA's press release states the recommendations apply to all patients regardless of age or health status, and names pregnancy specifically. The ADA's own X-rays topic page, updated as recently as March 2026, still carries the same line: thyroid collars are no longer recommended for any imaging procedure in dentistry.

From the document

The use of lead abdominal aprons or thyroid collars on patients when conducting dental X-rays is no longer recommended.
ADA news release on the 2024 recommendations

Who it applies to

Every dental practice that takes radiographs, and every patient in the chair. The recommendations reach intraoral, panoramic and cephalometric imaging and CBCT.

Two things sit outside it. First, the law. The ADA's release says practitioners must adhere to all applicable federal, state and local regulations on radiation safety, and its news article adds that some states may mandate continued use of certain equipment, so dentists should abide by the laws and regulations where they practice. Hawaii's Board of Dentistry put out a notice on March 25, 2024 reminding licensees that Hawaii Revised Statutes §448-1.5 still requires a lead apron covering the patient's torso, and that a violation is improper conduct under the dental practice act. Texas went the other way and opened a rulemaking conversation: its board held a stakeholder meeting on September 27, 2024 on removing the apron requirement from 22 Texas Administrative Code §§108.42 and 113.2.

Second, staff. The panel's operator recommendations are separate from patient shielding; the ADA topic page notes it recommends dosimeters and work-practice controls for pregnant staff who work with X-rays.

What changed

The prior reference point was the joint ADA and FDA patient-selection recommendations, last revised in 2012, which described the use of protective aprons. The 2024 panel replaced apron-and-collar protection with beam restriction and receptor choice, and made the pregnancy question explicit: no exception.

The change is easier to explain to patients than it sounds. Rectangular collimation limits the beam to roughly the size of the receptor, so the abdomen and thyroid are largely outside the field before any apron would come into play; the apron was protecting against scatter that the equipment now keeps small. The figure above is that idea drawn as a schematic, not a dose measurement.

What to do in the practice

0 of 5 done

Ticks are saved in this browser only.

Where the source is

The ADA press release of February 1, 2024 is the plain-English statement and is the link under the title. The recommendations themselves are Benavides et al., JADA 2024;155(4):280-293.e4, published online the same day; the DOI link opens the article page (the full text is behind JADA access). The two state documents above are the Hawaii board notice and the Texas board stakeholder notice, each a one-page PDF.

ADAradiation safetyradiographsimagingCBCTguidelinestate boardscompliance

This page summarizes a published rule or document for dentists. The document itself governs; read it before you act on it, and check with counsel where a rule touches your state.

The Dental Grind

Every Monday, free: how a practice actually works, plus the podcast.