Clinical · Dental sleep medicine
AASM/AADSM Oral Appliance Therapy Guideline (2015): six recommendations that put the sleep physician first and the qualified dentist second
The 2015 joint AASM and AADSM clinical practice guideline replaced the 2006 practice parameters. Its six recommendations give the sleep physician the diagnosis and prescription and the qualified dentist a custom, titratable appliance and dental follow-up: STANDARD for snoring and CPAP-intolerant OSA, GUIDELINE for the other four.
Issued by
American Academy of Sleep Medicine and American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine
2015
- Status
- current
- Source
- doi.org
- Last read
- 2026-09-13
- recommendations: two STANDARD, four GUIDELINE
- 6
- mean reduction in AHI with an oral appliance, pooled from 34 RCTs and 1,301 adult patients
- 13.60 events/h
- of recognized dental sleep medicine CE in the last two years, one of the guideline's qualified-dentist criteria
- 25 hours
- published in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11(7):773-827, replacing the 2006 practice parameters
- Jul 15, 2015
Covered
3- Adult patients with primary snoring (without obstructive sleep apnea) who request treatment, once a sleep physician has made the diagnosis
- Adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are intolerant of CPAP therapy or prefer alternate therapy; the guideline says CPAP remains the first-line or primary therapy for severe OSA and oral appliances are reserved for those who did not benefit from or could not tolerate it
- The two clinicians it names: a sleep physician (board-certified or board-eligible in sleep medicine) who diagnoses, prescribes and orders follow-up testing, and a qualified dentist who selects, fabricates, fits and follows the appliance
Not covered
3- Children: the literature search was limited to adults and studies on pediatric patients were excluded, so the guideline gives no pediatric recommendation
- Central or complex sleep apnea, and diagnosis itself, which were excluded from the review; the guideline also says the diagnosis of primary snoring should be rendered by a sleep physician and not a dentist
- Tongue retaining devices, for which the task force found insufficient evidence, and severity-specific guidance, which the guideline explicitly does not provide because most trials did not report results by OSA severity
Timeline
1995
1995
AASM publishes its initial position statement on oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea
2006
2006
AASM practice parameters on oral appliances (An Update for 2005) and the accompanying review paper, the documents this guideline replaces
2013
Mar
AADSM publishes its consensus definition of an effective oral appliance, focused on custom, titratable devices; the guideline adopts it
2015
May
Manuscript received and accepted; the draft had been posted for a two-week public comment period on the AASM and AADSM websites and approved by both boards
Jul 15
Published in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11(7):773-827, and co-published in the Journal of Dental Sleep Medicine, 2(3):71-125
2019
2019
AADSM updates its definition of an effective oral appliance (the 2014 definition, revised to reflect later evidence)
2025
2025
AADSM publishes its updated Dental Sleep Medicine Standards for oral appliance therapy in the Journal of Dental Sleep Medicine and lists the 2015 guideline in its guidelines archive; the AASM guidelines page still lists it under sleep-related breathing disorders
2026
2026Latest
AADSM announces a GRADE-based clinical practice guideline development process, with guidelines in development
What it says
The guideline was commissioned by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine to replace the AASM's 2006 practice parameters on oral appliances, because the literature on clinical outcomes had grown considerably since. A seven-member task force (three sleep physicians, two dentists with expertise in oral appliances, two AASM research staff) searched PubMed and Embase from January 2004, updated the search to February 28, 2013, screened 377 citations, and used 51 articles for data extraction, meta-analysis and grading under a modified GRADE process. Strength of recommendation came from a table: STANDARD when benefits clearly outweigh harms with high or moderate quality evidence, GUIDELINE when benefits clearly outweigh harms with low quality evidence or when benefits and harms are closely balanced with high or moderate evidence, OPTION for the weaker cells, and STANDARD against a therapy whenever harms clearly outweigh benefits regardless of evidence quality.
The six recommendations, with their strengths, are these. First, sleep physicians should prescribe oral appliances, rather than no therapy, for adult patients who request treatment of primary snoring without obstructive sleep apnea (STANDARD; quality of evidence high). Second, when oral appliance therapy is prescribed by a sleep physician for an adult patient with obstructive sleep apnea, a qualified dentist should use a custom, titratable appliance over non-custom oral devices (GUIDELINE; evidence low). Third, sleep physicians should consider prescription of oral appliances, rather than no treatment, for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are intolerant of CPAP therapy or prefer alternate therapy (STANDARD; evidence moderate). Fourth, qualified dentists should provide oversight, rather than no follow-up, of oral appliance therapy in adult OSA patients, to survey for dental-related side effects or occlusal changes and reduce their incidence (GUIDELINE; evidence low). Fifth, sleep physicians should conduct follow-up sleep testing to improve or confirm treatment efficacy, rather than follow-up without sleep testing, for patients fitted with oral appliances (GUIDELINE; evidence low). Sixth, sleep physicians and qualified dentists should instruct adult patients treated with oral appliances for OSA to return for periodic office visits, as opposed to no follow-up, with a qualified dentist and a sleep physician (GUIDELINE; evidence low). Every one of the six was judged to have benefits that clearly outweigh harms.
The numbers behind them are pooled from randomized trials in adults. Across 34 RCTs with 1,301 patients, oral appliances reduced AHI by a mean of 13.60 events per hour (95% CI 11.95 to 15.25); custom appliances by 13.89 across 33 RCTs, non-custom appliances by 6.28 across two small RCTs with wide confidence intervals; custom titratable appliances by 13.80 across 27 RCTs and custom non-titratable by 12.51 across six. Against CPAP, in 15 head-to-head RCTs (491 patients on an appliance, 481 on CPAP), the mean AHI reduction was 6.24 events per hour greater with CPAP, and CPAP also did better on minimum oxygen saturation (3.11 percentage points) and arousal index (3.57 per hour). The guideline's conclusion is direct: CPAP remains the first-line or primary therapy for adult patients with severe OSA, and oral appliance therapy should be reserved for severe OSA patients who did not benefit from or were intolerant of CPAP. Side effects are mostly dental (sore teeth, gum problems, sore jaw muscles, excessive salivation, difficulty chewing in the morning, dry mouth, change in occlusion); one two-year comparison found overbite and overjet decreased 1.2 and 1.5 mm with an appliance. Discontinuation because of side effects was less likely with an appliance than with CPAP (odds 0.54 to 1 across eight RCTs).
Two definitions matter for a dental office. An oral appliance is a device intended to protrude and stabilize the mandible to maintain a patent airway during sleep; a custom appliance is fabricated from digital or physical impressions and models of the patient's own oral structures, is not a prefabricated item that is trimmed, bent or relined, and engages both arches; titratable appliances have a mechanism that allows varying amounts of mandibular protrusion. And a qualified dentist should hold a valid state license and proof of liability coverage and have at least one of: certification in dental sleep medicine by a non-profit organization, designation as the dental director of a dental sleep medicine facility accredited by a non-profit organization, or a minimum of 25 hours of recognized continuing education in dental sleep medicine (ADA CERP or AGD PACE) from a dental sleep medicine non-profit or an accredited dental school in the last two years.
From the document
Diagnosis of primary snoring should be rendered by a sleep physician and not a dentist, as snoring is frequently accompanied by OSA, and misdiagnosis can have serious implications for the patient.
Who it applies to
Adults with primary snoring who request treatment, and adults with OSA who cannot tolerate CPAP or prefer something else, once a sleep physician, defined as board-certified or board-eligible in sleep medicine, has made the diagnosis. The guideline is written for two clinicians at once, and it assigns the roles: the physician diagnoses, prescribes and tests; the dentist chooses and fits a custom titratable appliance, watches the teeth and the bite, and shares the follow-up.
It does not reach children (pediatric studies were excluded), central or complex sleep apnea, or tongue retaining devices, for which evidence was insufficient. It gives no guidance by OSA severity because the trials mostly did not. And it is not a mandate: the guideline says its recommendations define principles of practice that should meet the needs of most patients in most situations, should not be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care, and leave the ultimate judgment to the clinician, sleep physician and dentist, in light of the individual patient.
What changed
Versus 2006, the change is the volume of evidence and the specificity of the roles. The 2006 parameters already supported oral appliances for primary snoring at STANDARD strength; the 2015 guideline adds the OSA recommendation at STANDARD, names custom titratable devices as the dentist's default, and makes dental oversight, physician sleep testing and periodic dual follow-up explicit recommendations. It also imported the AADSM's 2013 definition of an effective appliance and the qualified-dentist criteria.
Since 2015 the two issuers have moved at different speeds. The AASM's clinical practice guidelines index still lists Oral Appliance Therapy for the Treatment of OSA and Snoring in Adults under sleep-related breathing disorders. The AADSM has updated its definition of an effective oral appliance (2019), published its own Dental Sleep Medicine Standards for screening, treatment and management with oral appliance therapy as an update in 2025, moved the 2015 guideline to its guidelines archive, and announced for 2026 a GRADE-based process for new clinical practice guidelines that are, at the time of reading, still in development. The 2015 document remains the joint physician-dentist guideline and the one the published evidence tables belong to; the AADSM's 2025 standards are the current dental-side practice document. Quote the one you are relying on.
What to do in the practice
0 of 7 done
Ticks are saved in this browser only.
Where the source is
The link under the title is the DOI for the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine article, 2015;11(7):773-827, which resolves to the journal's site; the full text is free on PubMed Central (PMC4481062) as a page and a PDF, and the AADSM hosts the 55-page Journal of Dental Sleep Medicine co-publication (2015;2(3):71-125) in its guidelines archive. The recommendation statements, the strength table, the pooled numbers, the qualified-dentist criteria and the side-effect data above were read from the PMC full text and the JDSM PDF; the AASM and AADSM listing status was read from their guideline pages on September 13, 2026. The article is copyright 2015 American Academy of Sleep Medicine; the journal's own page requires JavaScript and refused automated tools in this session.
AASMAADSMsleep apneaoral appliance therapydental sleep medicineguidelinemedical collaborationphysician referral
This page summarizes a published rule or document for dentists. The document itself governs; read it before you act on it, and check with counsel where a rule touches your state.
Every Monday, free: how a practice actually works, plus the podcast.