Ryan Smith DDS

Blog

Is This Simple Fee Change the Key to Saving the U.S. Dental Lab Industry?

Fellow dentists, let’s talk about a critical issue that quietly undermines the quality of our work, our professional satisfaction, and the very survival of our partners in care: the American dental lab.

Are you frustrated by the relentless squeeze of PPO fee schedules? Does it feel like you’re constantly forced to choose between profitability and using the high-quality local lab you trust? You’re not alone. We’re caught in a systemic race to the bottom, and it’s time we talked about the solution.

This isn’t just a financial complaint; it’s about the future of our craft. The pressure to cut costs is directly threatening the existence of skilled domestic lab technicians, and it’s forcing compromises in the quality of care our patients receive. Today, we’re not just dissecting the problem—we’re proposing a clear, actionable solution that could revitalize our industry.

A Firsthand Look at an Unsustainable Model

My perspective on this crisis was forged when my dental group decided to bring our lab work in-house. We were doing a high volume of implant restorations, and on paper, it made financial sense. We built a state-of-the-art facility and hired a great team.

What I learned very quickly is that running a lab is a tough, high-stress business. But the most shocking lesson was economic. As I delved into the cost structure, I gained a profound appreciation for how impossible it is for a quality-focused U.S. lab to compete on price with overseas operations. The cost to produce a crown in some international labs is astonishingly low—often near or even below what the raw materials alone cost us here.

The economic pressure is so immense that many so-called “domestic labs” are, in reality, just logistics hubs. They outsource the bulk of their fabrication to other countries to stay competitive, especially for PPO work. While I understand the business rationale, this trend is hollowing out our domestic industry, causing a decline in quality and a loss of invaluable craftsmanship.

The Core of the Problem: The Bundled PPO Fee

So, how did we get here? The root of the problem lies in how PPO contracts are structured. Let’s take a crown (CDT code D2740) as an example. The insurance company sets a single, capped fee for the entire procedure. That fee has to cover not only our clinical work—the diagnosis, prep, impression, temporization, and seating—but also the external lab bill.

As inflation drives up our overhead—staff salaries, rent, and materials—that PPO fee remains stagnant. When every other cost is rising and the total fee is capped, the pressure inevitably falls on the largest variable cost: the lab bill.

This forces even the most quality-conscious dentists into a corner, compelling them to seek cheaper lab options to maintain any semblance of profitability. The consequences are severe:

  1. Compromised Quality: You can’t expect the same artistry, precision, and material integrity from a rock-bottom-priced lab. This leads to more adjustments, more remakes, and less predictable long-term outcomes for our patients.
  2. A Shrinking Domestic Industry: Talented technicians are leaving the field, and small, high-quality labs are closing their doors. We are losing generations of expertise and the local partners we rely on for complex cases.

This system forces a compromise that nobody wants—not the dentist, not the unsuspecting patient, and certainly not the struggling U.S. lab technician.


Watch the full breakdown of the problem and the path forward.


A Powerful Solution: Decouple the Lab Fee

How do we break this destructive cycle? The answer is to fundamentally restructure how we handle lab fees within the insurance model.

We must decouple the laboratory fee from the dental procedure code.

The CDT code for a crown should cover the dentist’s clinical services. The laboratory fabrication should be a separate line item. Crucially, insurance companies should not be allowed to cap the fee for this custom-manufactured medical device.

Think about it. When a patient gets eyeglasses, their insurance may cover the exam and offer an allowance for frames. If they want premium designer frames, they pay the difference. Why is dentistry treated differently?

Adopting this model would have a profound, positive impact:

  • Empowered Patients: We could offer our patients a transparent choice. “Your insurance contributes X amount for the lab work. We can use a standard lab within that budget, or we can partner with a premier local artisan for an additional fee to achieve superior aesthetics and use premium materials. The choice is yours.”
  • Restored Dentist Autonomy: We could finally select labs based on quality, service, and skill—not just price. Imagine the reduced stress and increased professional pride that comes from consistently delivering exceptional restorations without the fee constraints.
  • A Revitalized U.S. Lab Industry: High-quality domestic labs could finally compete on a level playing field. They could differentiate based on excellence, encouraging investment in technology and training for the next generation of technicians.
  • Fairer Compensation: Dentists would be compensated appropriately for their clinical work, and the health of our practices would improve, allowing for reinvestment in our teams and technology.

It’s Time for a Change

Will insurance carriers resist? Probably. But this is a fight for the integrity of our profession. The first step is awareness and conversation. Talk about this with your colleagues, in your study clubs, and at your dental society meetings. The more of us who understand and advocate for this change, the more powerful our collective voice will become.

What are your thoughts? Are PPO fees impacting your lab choices? Let’s get this vital conversation started in the comments below.


Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Posts

Scroll to Top